But now, when carbon-based chip technology has made a comprehensive breakthrough, if you use these methods again, it depends on whether we will ignore you!

You know, the performance and potential of carbon-based chips far exceed that of silicon-based chips.

In another year of development, when they have mobile phones and other electronic products using the latest carbon-based chips, what can silicon-based chips do to compete with them?

Perhaps the United States may unite with other allies to prohibit the sale of carbon-based chips and related products under "national security" inspections within a short period of time.

But if they can persist for a while, can they persist for a lifetime?

The market will always favor better products, this is a rule that no one can change.

If they really choose to do this, it will be a situation that this side is more willing to see.

After all, how did the Qing Dynasty become the past? It is just there.

Moreover, even if it is a ban, can they ban their allies?

Carbon-based chips are a much larger market than silicon-based chips. It is so huge that it not only replaces silicon-based semiconductors, but also cannot be fully consumed by China alone.

They can control the core technology and upstream industries of carbon-based chips, and establish their own new rules, technical barriers and voice.

But those industries and markets in the middle and lower reaches are destined to be allocated.

And as long as they raise their fingers, whether it is Intel, Qualcomm, or even unique companies such as Apple and Samsung, they will rush over to cooperate with them.

After all, in the era of carbon-based chips, only through cooperation can they have a chance to survive.

If you still choose to cling to the silicon-based semiconductor industry chain and not accept new technologies, then the lessons learned from Nokia and Motorola are right in front of you.

For the entire silicon-based semiconductor alliance, the collapse from within is the most fatal!

...
Chapter completed!