On the table, I stood aside and looked at me with a sweet look on my face.

"Just just now, if you think about it, I'll give you these newspapers." Holgina suddenly remembered something, turned around and picked up a stack of newspapers from the coffee table and placed them in front of me.

Without reading, I know what the content will be on these newspapers.

While eating snacks, I took the newspapers and looked them through them carefully.

All newspapers used almost all the pages at the award ceremony for reporting the Harvey Awards.

The front page of the Los Angeles Times has no articles for the first time, but replaced it with an extremely huge picture. This picture is the podium at the awards ceremony. The model of the huge golden feather trophy on the podium accounts for almost three-quarters of the picture. When it is lowered, there is a row of golden feather trophys. There is nothing else, not even a person. It seems that this photo is not officially taken at the awards ceremony. On the photo, there is a line of bold titles: "The first Harvey Awards have closed, and DreamWorks has won eight trophys and become the biggest winner!"

In the following page, the Los Angeles Times introduced the award ceremony in detail and then made its own evaluation of the ownership of each award.

"At the first Harvey Awards ceremony last night, DreamWorks won eight trophys and became the protagonist of the awards ceremony that night. This is the reward they deserve! In fact, this great film company deserves at least eight awards!"

"The best film and the best script were won by "Brave Heart" at the same time, which is the result that everyone is satisfied! No matter how excellent other films it competes with, such as MGM's "***", Warner's "People's Prince", Paramount's "Operation Ghost", etc., they are not rivals of "Brave Heart" because from the beginning, they were not on the same level as this masterpiece. Whether it is the plot design of the script, the creative use of visual language, or the profound ideological connotation of the movie and the powerful appeal of the movie, the other films cannot be compared with "Brave Heart" at all.

The Heart is comparable. When we watch "***", "Student Prince" and "Opera Ghost", we think these movies are good, but they are also staying at the level of goodness. In the context of Hollywood, these movies are good, and the use of shots, scene scheduling, actor performances, etc. are very good in all aspects. But compared with "Brave Heart", they lack the power that makes people feel excited and involuntarily! And Chacha, this is the most precious thing in the movie! Not to mention anything else, William Wallace's free roar is enough in "Brave Heart"!"

Seeing the Los Angeles Times' comment on "Brave Heart" like this, I couldn't help but feel happy.

And some of the following words make me even more confused about what to say.

When evaluating the Best Supporting Actor awarded by MGM Dime Mood, the Los Angeles Times raised a slight doubt: "Objectively speaking, among the four people nominated for Best Supporting Actor, Wallace Red and John Janet of Bivorgruff Films, are not qualified, so this award will undoubtedly be between MGM's old actor May Mood and DreamWorks newcomer Humphrey Bogart. These two people have their own advantages. Mei Mood left us with many classic images, and his performance in "Master Key" was also perfect. But this actor is old and it is time to attract the attention of the actor.

It's time to retreat. He hasn't had much innovation in movies. The new actor of Humphrey Bogart, who may be the greatest male star in Hollywood in the future, made us look so surprised. If we put aside the qualifications and specific identities of both parties, just looking at the performance, we think Humphrey Bogart should receive this award more than Mei Mood. However, the award is often easily disturbed by other factors. Giving this award to Mei Mood is considered a thank you to this old actor and Young. After all, Humphrey Bogart will have a long life in Hollywood in the future."

The Los Angeles Times believes that the Best Supporting Actor Award should have been awarded to Bogart. However, the jury awarded it to May and Pang Mao, which may be more considered by considering the great contributions made by this respectable old actor to Hollywood throughout his life. So they basically agree with this result.

Not only them, I think I am the judge of the judging committee, and when I encounter such a thing, I am very likely to do this.

The Los Angeles Times did not take any effort to get the Best Actor, but instead joked in a relaxed tone: "The Best Actor was won by Andre Corleon, just like Lincoln should be an American. It is natural. His performance in "Brave Heart" is simply possessed by William Wallace, and he completely interprets the image of a hero who struggles for freedom to be deeply touching. In fact, we can see that in "Brave Heart", Mr. Corleon is the true performance. In real life, he is a hero who struggles for freedom without fail!"

If the Los Angeles Times has no opinion on the jury on these awards, then the Los Angeles Times expressed strong dissatisfaction with the jury on the jury on the Best Supporting Actress Award to MGM’s Babe Daniel.

"We can say without any hesitation that the judges voted for the best supporting actress! And that's very certain! Yes, Babe Daniel's performance in "Ben Hurry" was very outstanding, but her performance was neither as good as Miss Julie's performance in "Brave Heart" nor Miss Katherine Hepburn's performance in "Hollywood Story". We can see that DreamWorks, the two actresses nominated for supporting actresses, are the best supporting actors in Hollywood in recent years. Their performance has a charm that other Hollywood actors lack very much. This charm makes them amazing on the screen. Babe Daniel does not have this charm. The reason why she won this trophy is not determined by her performance but by two factors that have nothing to do with her performance."

"The first of these two factors is that Babe Darnell is much older in Hollywood than Julie and Catherine Hepburn. The second is that the judges on the jury may well think that DreamWorks has won enough awards, so they made some compromises to make the award ceremony end in all the joys, so they made a decision to share the awards and make the best

The award was awarded to MGM’s Babe Daniel.”

After analyzing this, the Los Angeles Times was a little angry, and the report wrote in fierce words: "It can be said that this award is a failure of the judges on the jury committee! A failure that makes people angry! DreamWorks Film Company won two of the four nominations, and the two nominated actors are much better than Bebe Daniel, but none of them won the award. This can only be explained in one word, that is injustice! If DreamWorks did not win so many trophies, I think this award must be them!"

The Los Angeles Times' tone calmed down when talking about the Best Supporting Actress.

"Miss Marlene can be excluded first for the four nominees for Best Actress. The award will be produced among Miss Garbo, Lillian Gish and Clara Bo. It is undeniable that these three are the most popular female stars in Hollywood. Lillian Gish and Clara Bo were popular ten years ago. Lillian Gish has been popular for a long time. Lillian Gish has a touching beauty. But this kind of beauty is always a bit dull, Clara Bo.

She is the sexy queen of Hollywood. But her sexyness is just a carnal sexiness and has no foundation. Miss Garbo is completely different. She is beautiful and noble and elegant, like Venus, who comes out of ancient Greek murals and sculptures, makes people feel happy but dare not have the slightest blasphemy. Such temperament is unique among Hollywood actresses. Therefore, she is the most suitable to be the owner of the Best Actress Trophy."

The person who wrote the comments should be a loyal fan of Garbodi. He used almost all the words of praise in his articles. Although the analysis made sense, he also underestimated the beauty of Lilian, Gish and Clara, and Bao.

At the Best Photography Award, the Los Angeles Times has not commented much: "As one of the three giants in DreamWorks, Mr. Berg is the most perfect interpreter of director Corleon. We cannot imagine that if such a great photographer is missing, Mr. Corleon's works will lose so much spirit. This Best Photography Award is well deserved."

When mentioning the Best Art Award and Best Makeup Award, the Los Angeles Times did not evaluate whether the winner was eligible for the award, but focused on the two awards themselves.

"When he won the Best Makeup Award, Lewis Grett said something very touching. I think when he said those words, everyone who heard them would feel sad. The establishment of these two awards is the most humane part of the Harvey Award! In the eyes of others, these two awards are insignificant compared to some other important awards, but for Hollywood, the work of these staff members at the bottom of the film industry is essential. Without them, Hollywood cannot be called Hollywood, and without them, there will be no Hollywood movies. Therefore, when Lewis Grett and William Hurt came on stage to receive the award, everyone couldn't help but be happy that the Harvey Award had such two awards!"

Next, the Los Angeles Times made a hilarious comment on the Best Music Award: "This year's Best Music Award was won by DreamWorks Films, just as natural as a child was born of a woman."

When analyzing the ownership of the Best Short Film Awards, the Los Angeles Times unexpectedly made a long list of arguments.

"The Best Short Film Award is an seemingly unimportant award, but this award is the least to be underestimated, because the nominated young director is likely to be the first-class film master in Hollywood in the future!"

"What we can be sure of at the moment is that Fred Zinerman, who won the Best Short Film Award, has been signed by MGM Movie. This film empire that claims to have more stars than the stars in the sky, has always liked to start first. However, another movie super giant Paramount also signed another nominated director John Houston, and the remaining two directors, Porter Lee, have been signed by Warner Bros. As for Carmine Coppola, someone saw him and Mr. Andre Corleon having a long talk at the awards ceremony, and both sides seemed to be very interested in each other."

"It is certain that the four young directors nominated for the Best Short Film Award this year are no less skilled in filming than some of the famous directors now. We can see that Fred Zinerman's amazing talent for the rhythm and cameras of the film may be played in his movie "My Day". The jury believes that this young director has a clear DreamWorksman style, and this evaluation is lacking. We can see something extremely exciting and familiar from Zinerman and from his movies. This thing has been the privilege of those directors of the DreamWorksman for a long time, but now, we are very happy to see that this excellent and most advanced thing in today's film industry has begun to appear on other film directors, which is a good thing."

"Zinaman will be an amazing director, his films have profound thoughts and great connotations."

"Compared with Zinerman, John Houston, who was signed by Paramount, will be a successful commercial director! Otherwise, Adolf Chuck would not have signed him. The director's movies do not have any profound philosophy or social thinking, but in making stories, Houston is a good player. He knows what kind of movies the audience likes to watch and what kind of movies can make money. He has amazing talents in commercial movies, and his achievements are naturally very much expected."

"Carmann Coppola is an anomaly. It can be said that his movies are not suitable for Hollywood. If the only company in Hollywood is interested in him, it can only be a dream factory. It can only be Mr. Andre Corleon. Mr. Coppola is undoubtedly a typical elite. His movies also have an elite consciousness. His movies are difficult to read by ordinary audiences. However, filmmakers with a level of ability can get some profound inspiration from his movies. Such people are suitable for being explorers on the road of film."

"As a black director, Porter Lee, a short film "Fire" that lasted less than half an hour, surprised everyone who saw it. This black director has a unique vision of society. The special nature of his identity also determines the particularity of his film works. It can be said that he is not as good as Zenerman in artistic achievements, and in commercial operations, he is not as good as Houston, but he has what these two people do not have.

It is an idea that has been neglected by this society for a long time, and this idea makes it thicker."

I don't know who wrote the article reviewing the Best Short Film Awards, but I have to admire his analysis of Zinerman, Houston and others. These analyses are very insightful and hit the key points. They can see their character's future development prospects from a short work of these people. This person is definitely not simple.

When improving the best foreign language films, the Los Angeles Times comments obviously did not fall alone in the movie.

"I think there are still many people who don't know where China is, of course, no one knows about this mysterious ancient Eastern country. The first thing that makes us curious about this country was what Mr. Corleone said in public when he received the Medal of Freedom. He said that he gave the medal to that guy and called it the sleeping Oriental Dragon."

"It was Mr. Corleon who invited the Chinese to come in and enthusiastically supported their films, providing us with the opportunity to understand an ancient country with a long civilization of five thousand years. Mr. Zhang Shichuan's "The Valley of the Valley" is an excellent work even in Hollywood. The impression left by this film is not only that it tells a moving story and satisfies the curiosity of some of us, but also that culture has nothing to do with the strength of a country. It also tells us that any country is equal and people in any country are free."

"When Mr. Zhang Shichuan won the award, he said something that had nothing to do with the movie, which deeply moved us. For filmmakers in such a weak country, they have more sense of responsibility and a sense of danger than us, which makes them unconsciously use the cameras in their hands as tools for fighting for national freedom! It is also from these Chinese film people that we feel that movies have such noble and important roles in addition to making us smile!"

"Through this movie, we learned about China. Through this movie, we learned about a nation's determination to fight for freedom and prosperity. I think even if Mr. Zhang Shichuan did not win the Best Foreign Language Film Award, he was also the winner."

Regarding the Best Documentary Award, the Los Angeles Times only used a picture and a sentence to explain their attitude. In the picture, Flahad was giving the trophy in his hand to Adolf Chuck. The sentence below the photo was: "Awkward trophy, not awkward documentary, this day is the day when the documentary officially appeared on the stage of history."

The commentary article about the Best Director Award was written by Douglas, the editor-in-chief of the Los Angeles Times. In this article, he now tirelessly praised the works of seven directors, commented one by one, and then got to the point.

"The Best Director Award is the most important award among all the Harvey Awards. The winner of this award aroused heated discussions before the Harvey Awards ceremony. The seven directors nominated are all the greatest directors in Hollywood. This can be seen from my analysis above. Among the seven directors, DreamWorks Films account for three, so many people think that in terms of quantity, DreamWorks has much greater chance of winning the most important trophy, but what I want to say is that there are four directors of DreamWorks Films! In addition to Stiller and Muno, there are also Andre Corleon of "Brave Heart" and Andre Corleon of "Hollywood Story"! Many people ignore the fact that director Corleon was nominated for two movies!"

"Of these seven directors, director Stiller and director Munau are unlikely to win the Golden Feather Trophy from the beginning, not because their films are bad. In fact, their films are much better than some of the nominated directors, but because there is an Andre Corleon above them. I say that, not because Andre Corleon is their boss, and they cannot complete the trophy with their boss, but because Stiller and Munau are Andre Corleon students, and their films cannot surpass Andre Corleon in a short period of time, so the three directors of DreamWorks are actually Andre Corleon alone, and this power is huge."

"The remaining four directors, King Vidor, were first excluded. His "The Great Barthle" was a successful movie compared to ordinary movies, but it was a bit overshadowed by first-class Hollywood movies. Liu Bieqian of South China Brothers Film Company, his movies are smart, but too commercial. The Best Director Award not only requires the box office of the movie, but more importantly, the quality. Mr. Sissy Dimil returned to the familiar path after the failure of "Washington" and achieved considerable success, but it was also officially because he returned to his original creation, so it seemed extremely old. In this way, only one John Ford could compete with Andre Corleon. His "Blue Angel" is an extremely good work, but he was also not confident in front of Andre Corleon, who was nominated for the two films of "Brave Heart" and "Hollywood Story".

"The Best Director Award was won by Andre Corleon, which is acceptable to everyone and deserves it. I now begin to feel that this award may become an exclusive award for Andre Corleon in the future. For this reason, I suggest that we can set up a Best Director Golden Feather Award and a Best Director Silver Feather Award. In this way, we can also have multiple suspenses when awarding each year?"

Douglas's proposal made me laugh. This guy really respects me too much.
Chapter completed!