Amidst the applause, the main creator came on stage to express his thanks.

However, the audience's performance was slightly divided. The average audience found it quite good-looking, could laugh constantly, and liked Juno as a cool girl. They also had some aftertaste of the meaning after watching it.

Professionals always feel that there is some lack of taste. The subject matter is indeed very good, but the exploration is not very profound. However, they also admit that this art film is not dull and should be more entertaining, especially the heroine is quite successful in shaping and caters to

Those teenagers who love to be cool.

Wei Guoquan finished his speech of thanks very quickly. He must have worked hard, but he actually stuttered and recited French. Although no one could understand the French, the audience still applauded warmly.

As the question and answer session began, someone immediately asked Rong Guang: "Rong, why do you use comedy to deal with such a subject? Don't you think this is offensive to those miserable women?"

Rong Guang smiled slightly: "Those who are familiar with my works should know that my creative concept is to be a quiet observer! Including this rural female teacher, there are four main characters in this film. They are all ordinary people.

Good people in the sense of the word, they are kind-hearted, can distinguish right from wrong, and have a sense of justice. However, they don’t know whether their actions are correct? Including the final confusion of the heroine Juno. In fact, just like in "Juno 1", this is a story of growth.

Story. We will do wrong things, and we will also be naive, compromised, helpless and confused. But I am still an optimist and believe that as long as people have a kind heart, the world will become better and better. As for comedy techniques?

This is purely a creative technique. Use comedy techniques to tell a tragedy, or use tragic techniques to tell a comedy? They are more commonly used in dramas. But what makes me very happy is that director Wei Guoquan captured the essence of the script and presented it perfectly.

The whole plot comes out.”

In this regard, Rong Guang has always been more careful. Regardless of whether Wei Guoquan is a tool man or not, as long as he is in front of outsiders, he will still maintain his authority as a director.

Then another reporter raised his hand and asked: "Rong, I found that the village was relatively affluent. It was not like the Chinese movies I had seen in the past. The scenery in it... well, forgive my bluntness. It was just a comparison of the sceneries.

It’s dirty and shabby, and the characters are relatively ignorant and numb. I’m very curious, is this really China in this movie?”

Rong Guang smiled bitterly in his heart, this is all the fault of the sixth generation!

"Actually, both situations are true. China is a very big country!" Rong Guang explained amid laughter, "Due to China's economic growth, many villages have undergone great changes. The original

There are fewer, and now there are more and more modern villages. But the choice of such modern villages is mainly related to the core of the film."

"Core?"

"Yes! If you look at the female teacher's experience alone, this is a criminal act that harms her physically and mentally. There is no doubt about this. However, poverty has brought about many social phenomena, such as public security problems and problems with delinquent teenagers.

There is also the issue of trafficking in this film. This film is used to think like this - which is the priority between the issue of wealth and the issue of human rights? Of course, as long as you are an upright and moral person, you will definitely give priority to the issue of human rights! But the issue of poverty

How to solve it? Sorry, I don’t have the answer here, I am just an observer.”

The whole audience laughed. Someone else asked: "Rong, I personally like your work very much. But your "Juno 2" seems... more commercial and not as profound as before. Is it your creation?

Has the style slowly changed?"

Nodding to his fan, Rong Guang smiled and said: "Sorry, this is the last question. Time is limited, do you want to give other actors in the crew a chance?"

Amidst the applause, Rong Guang replied: "I think there are two ways to express realistic themes. One is the author's film, which expresses his heart directly and directly attacks the audience's soul. This way of expression is more self-centered and basically does not consider box office issues.

The other is my creative concept. I pay more attention to the audience's feelings, hoping that more audiences will like it. Of course, it also brought good box office results. Just like the previous "Parasite", ordinary audiences should also like it.

?Although "Sparks" is my semi-autobiographical work, commemorating my years of working as a chore on the crew, I still chose to change my career and replaced film and television actors with stand-up comedians. I laughed with tears and added a lot of entertainment.

, which is what you call commercial."

"I want to make it clear here that there is no right or wrong in these two expressions. We are all a generation affected by the New Wave. It is estimated that the New Wave will still have an impact for a long time. But the New Wave should not only have author films. I hope it can

There are more genres and the charm of film art can be better displayed. Thank you!”

"..."

…

It didn't take long for "Juno 2" to receive a screening score of 2.6, ranking fourth among the shortlisted films. Cannes' screening score is based on scores from professional film critics, with a maximum score of 4, but the scoring standards are quite similar.

It's harsh, and those who can score more than 3 points are already rare.

For example, the program score of "Parasite" is 3.4 points. Interestingly, the score of the original version of "Parasite" actually reached 3.5 points. I estimate that the 0.1 point deduction was probably because of the idol star Leonardo DiCaprio starring?

"Juno 2" should be for the same reason - professional film critics can't stand it.

These professional film critics don't like commercial or entertainment films very much, and prefer author films. The best ratio is 30-70, 70-70 for artistry, and 30-30 for viewing.

After all, this is a movie that is meant to be watched by the audience. It cannot be without a little bit of enjoyment.

However, Rong Guang still prefers to watch, accounting for at least 50 to 60 percent of the film. The film has a fast pace, bright pictures, coupled with Juno's personal charm, and there are also laughs interspersed in it...

Relatively speaking, it is more friendly to the audience. Therefore, it cannot please the film critics.

However, among the shortlisted works this year, there is no one with a score of more than 3 points. Therefore, the score difference between them is not very big.

This surprised Rong Guang. At least "Fahrenheit 9/11" and "Oldboy" are both famous, right? How come they didn't get high scores?

Thinking that it was "Fahrenheit 9/11" that won the Palme d'Or in the end, maybe those film critics collectively went crazy?

However, Rong Guang no longer had any hope. Anyway, no matter how hard the butterfly wings are, the big winner this year will definitely be "Fahrenheit 911".
Chapter completed!