First, let’s talk about the contents of the third volume first.

Actually, I have been laying the groundwork from the beginning, and some book friends should have realized the special features of Euclid from the beginning.

Even if I use the contents of this whole volume, I cannot reflect Euclid's greatness.

Euclid's greatness is beyond imagination, both in reality and in the world of magic.

Similarly, the greatness of Aristotle, Thales, Pythagoras, Odox, etc. are equally great.

Well…I know there is some controversy about the history of Greece, but it doesn’t matter. I even just treat those characters as a symbol. They are just “representatives of the wisdom of the sages”. What’s important is that the wisdom of the sages exists, and they have promoted the development of the world and benefited each of us.

They let humans surpass animals and make humans better.

I won’t talk about the details. I haven’t recovered from this plot yet, so I won’t talk about it in detail.

2. I always said before that some things were to be said in the third volume or the end, but now I can finally say some.

Regarding the choice of this book "The World of Gods", I had said before that I originally wanted to write about Eastern and Western religions, but I finally realized that in an era when many things could not be written, that type was impossible to write, and then, I would transliterate the book.

Then why do I write this book in this way?

I later thought about it and summarized that there are probably three main reasons.

First, like it.

Although it is a bit willful to say this, I insist that an author can only write excellent works by writing what he really likes and believes in.

Second, some readers said that they read the previous version of "The Most Saint of Confucianism and Taoism", many times, and even said it more than ten times.

This made me feel a little frightened. I felt that I did not reach the level that readers said. So, I would work harder and write content worth reading ten times.

Or, I want to write something that I think is the most valuable.

I think so, and I do the same.

Third, I have always had a question.

All the networks I have seen, including those with very knowledgeable nature, are just writing some appearances. Well, click until it is not malice and avoid misunderstandings, so I don’t talk deeply about it.

To give an intuitive example, all the networks are writing about the protagonist climbing from the foot of the mountain to the top of the mountain, in which they write about the scenery, the protagonist sweats, the protagonist grits his teeth and persists, the protagonist does not give up, and so on...

But, however, all of this touches on something particularly important, the method of behavior, the method of thinking, and the method of method.

I think I can try writing.

Then, there is "World of the Gods".

Um……

As for the summary of the full text, I cannot say it now.

What I can say is that I struggled to write the first volume and the second volume was full of entanglements, but starting from the third volume, I became more and more stable as I wrote it.

It’s not that I feel like I’m doing well, but that this is indeed what I want to write and what I like.

I admit that what I want to write is actually beyond my writing ability, but is this important? It doesn't matter.

Importantly, I believe I like it, I act and I try it.

I tried to stand at the end of my life and asked myself, is it worth writing this book "The World of Gods"?

The answer at the end of life is worth it.

3. Many readers do not accept this method of online literature.

However, online literature is a world of diversified and diverse nature, and the rules of the real world are already overwhelming. If you have to follow any old iron rules in the world of online literature, wouldn’t that be too tired?

It’s like some readers say that this book is too preaching.

I don't object, but, from another perspective, this is normal explanation and argument, which is part of the composition.

The problem is, however, that I have not been able to write these things “in the way that the masses reader like.”

So, I accept criticism from readers and do not object.

So, I will definitely focus on improving this in the next book.

On the other hand, I have to explain.

The content I wrote was either summarized and refined by the top boss through a lifetime, or I figured it out from the book of the boss myself. Any single thing I can write a monograph.

Not to mention me, no writer in history can write so many things in the "way that the masses like". Even if they write them out, few people can understand them.

If writers and writers can write those things well, what should philosophers and scientists do?

So, the fundamental problem is that it is not that I write incorrectly, but that I chose the "written direction that is not popular enough".

Actually, I have two ways of writing.

One is to explain some points in detail like now.

The advantage of this is that as long as everyone looks carefully, they can understand that whether or not they are doing it is another matter.

But the downside is that it destroys a certain feeling and is not so pleasant enough.

The second type is to write normal writing methods, writing knowledge and principles into pure stories.

But I can guarantee, really, I can guarantee that if I don't explain, no one can see what I want to express except myself.

Who dares to say that "Dream of Red Mansions" is not great, who dares to say that all kinds of classic works are not great? But why are there so many explanations of so many works?

From ancient times to the present, whether it is the Four Books and Five Classics, the Tang and Song poetry, or the Ming and Qing Dynasties, various appreciations and analyses, even those scholars who make a living by making a living, can they really understand the author’s own intentions?

I can't understand! I really can't understand.

For example, I saw the most devastating poems, which were appreciated by Li Bai's words, "I am a madman in Chu, and the phoenix sings laugh at Confucius." It said that Li Bai mocked Confucius, and some people said that Li Bai was disappointed in the officialdom and completely drew a clear line with the dark court.

On Baidu, most of them are in this tune.

I really want to call those elder brothers. First of all, in the allusion quoted by Li Bai, Chu Kuangren did not "mock" Confucius. People say this: "The phoenix is ​​like a phoenix, how can the virtue decline? The past cannot be advised, but the coming can still be pursued. Then, now, those who are in politics are in danger."

To put it in plain language, Chu Kuangren shouted loudly: Confucius, you are a dragon and a phoenix among people. Why do you want to be an official in a broken place like Chu? You are a phoenix who is hiking into the mud and has a huge decline! The past cannot be changed, and now it is still time to stop being an official, so don’t be an official. It is too dangerous for those who are good at being an official. You should go back quickly.

Therefore, Chu Kuangren was a supporter of Confucius. He was not ridiculed or regretful, but admiration.

What does Li Bai mean when he uses this allusion?

To translate it in plain language, I am Li Bai, who is more arrogant and arrogant. I should be like Chu Kuangren and refuse to be an official. I should be as casual as an immortal. But in fact, my life is basically like Confucius, seeking an official position. I hope I can really be as open-minded as Chu Kuangren.

To put it bluntly, Li Bai compared himself to Chu Kuangren and Confucius at the same time, and did not mean to mock Confucius at all, but to mean to mock himself.

In addition, shouldn't everyone know that poets and lyrics can't write any crazy sentences for rhyme and pretending to be like?

These two lines of poetry are a portrayal of Li Bai's life journey: at first, he seeks an official like Confucius, but later he keeps hitting walls like Confucius. In the end, he feels regretful to Confucius like Chu, and regrets himself. In the end, he hopes that he will let go of his mentality of seeking an official like Confucius, play in the world, and become a true immortal.

What is different for the two people is that Confucius has indeed been a high-ranking official in power.

The same thing between the two is that they both surpass themselves in another field and reach the peak of life, that is, self-realization.

The whole poem and Li Bai's entire life are filled with regrets and contradictions, and it is not anything like the dark court.

So, I...I am not comparing to Li Bai.

Li Bai and Cao Xueqin cannot write words that allow professionals to understand. I am just the fire of eternity, why dare to write such deep things into pure stories and let readers understand them?

So, I chose to write too much explanatory and explanatory.

Suddenly I found that the online writer's level of trashing the blame is really high!

As for what I'm preaching, I'll explain it in detail after finishing the book.

What we can say now is what we will get as we define it.

What we believe, we will get.

Ahem, talk about the serious matter.

By the third volume, Su Ye has completely passed the growth period, and the explanatory content will be reduced, and I will be more restrained in the later stages.

Su Ye has excellent thinking, has clear goals, and masters the correct methods. Then, all of this will form a huge motivation to push him forward.

Next, what Su Ye needs to do is to work hard and persevere, and use the right methods to move forward step by step and make continuous progress under the guidance of thinking.

Actually, there are some things I want to say, but they are not suitable. After the whole book is finished, I will talk about it seriously.

The third volume officially ended. Today I mainly wrote the comments and thought about the plot of the fourth volume and the subsequent plot all day long, so there is no text update today.

Volume 4 will begin tomorrow.

Finally, Xiaohuo thanks to every reader who has seen it!

.

Please give me a monthly ticket!
Chapter completed!