My recent situation is like this: after posting the chapters at noon, I read the first round of book reviews about half an hour. The main purpose is to find typos found by readers and correct them as soon as possible so that the readers who come to the future can read more smoothly.

After that, at night or the next day, you will read the second round of book reviews and reader feedback.

I've seen some feedback recently.

For example, some readers say they don’t like the interaction between male and female characters. This is normal feedback. I can see it clearly and I will find ways to improve it.

However, some readers will say "these chapters are inexplicable" or "these chapters are all poisonous". I think the motivation of these readers is "I want this book to be better", so I would like to express my gratitude first.

But then the question is, I read these comments repeatedly, and I really don’t know where the “inexplicable” is, or where the “poisonous point” is, whether it is the characters, the plot, the action, the description, the rhetoric, the preparation, or something else.

So, I hope that all readers will do me a favor. When expressing feedback, try to say "what specific paragraph or specific matter is wrong" so that I can see it clearly.

For example: I think Hort's personality is like.

For example: I think this rhetoric is too exaggerated, it is awkward to have milk or cream.

For example: I think the five hot people in this plot are not good enough to perform well, so they should be more exciting.

Only by saying this can I understand, otherwise I really can't understand it, even if I break my head and try to improve, I can't do it.

The reason is very simple, each of us has different cognition methods.

I have only recently discovered this problem. Everyone's perception is like a ring. Everyone is using their own ring to cover things. Unfortunately, everyone's ring is like our fingerprints or iris. It seems similar, but in fact it is very different, so it has caused a lot of misunderstandings between people.

Those top people in various industries either have a very large ring that can accommodate many differences, or have more rings to separate different things. This is the realm I pursue.

Well, I seem to have said too much, but I can explain the meaning clearly anyway.

Let me do this, I will mention a general three-step feedback mode:

1. Specific question: I think flame goblin is a poison point.

2. Specific reasons: Because I think the flame goblin’s butt is not curled enough (slanted eyes and small expression)

3. Specific improvement: Let the flame goblin's butt be raised a little more! For example, write it as a peach-shaped...

It's probably that's it. Of course, if you're too lazy, just write the first two points.

Because the clearer and more perfect you write, the more I understand that the book is more likely to improve.

Otherwise, if you typed for a long time, you just didn't say it clearly. I was confused and might even have the opposite effect - this is the root of misunderstanding between men and women, don't ask me how I know...

Finally, thanks to every reader!
Chapter completed!