I saw a recent chapter saying that "open source data" will cause the spread of missile technology. The more I write, the more I am talking, the less realistic it is.

In fact, it is because of reality.

Recently, the real spacex company has opened source spacex-api, and anyone can check it out. Of course, it has not yet reached the open source power of the protagonist, so it has the meaning of writing.

From spacex-api to Tesla's patent disclosure, to Boston Dynamics' robot dog open source, these seem to indicate that open source is a future trend, at least it is a sign.

This phenomenon may be a market problem. Only open source can make the plate bigger, or it may be a problem with the company itself. Open source can save development costs, and there may be other factors (the author's bacteria level is not enough, so I can only think of it here).

As for the spread of technology, this is the most desired result of "open source" and the result of the protagonist's desire. Otherwise, what source should be opened?

It seems that anyone in the chapter can make this thing.

The answer is that no one can create it.

The technology of the atomic bomb B station has popular science, but only a few rogues can be created. As long as the machine starts to purify uranium, satellites in space can detect it. "Yilang" has already performed it himself, so you can create it only with the acquiesce of several rogues or in the game.

Then, if you enlarge your vision of the pattern and look at it, you will find that even if it is open source, it is actually a limited number of companies and citizens of major countries that can play. If others want to play, they have to go to the dock before they dare to play, because they have to consider the risk of being played by a hooligan halfway through the game, which itself is part of the game.

The content of this level of game will not be written out in a straightforward way. If you cannot pass the review, you can understand it.

Let’s talk about the technical issues. The plot opens the source of rocket technology, but does not disclose basic materials and processes. This is similar to knowing the principle of how to build an atomic bomb, but it is harder to build it than climbing the sky.

Knowing how to create and not create is different, so if you know how to create, you can create first, then follow the protagonist or work in a powerful group, which means you can achieve the goal of talent training.

Finally, based on the plot, the protagonist is now in the stage of technical catching up. The technology they have mastered is not exclusive, but has competitors. Open source technologies are actually causing trouble to the opponent, disrupting the rules of the game, muddling the water, lowering the threshold as a whole, and finally defeating the opponent in your absolute field with your unique skills.

As for some readers, the spread of technology is not good for everyone, and it will cause chaos in the world. The more you write, the more you become, the more you write, the less realistic you become.

Since I am so persistent and entangled in reality, then I ask: Isn’t the world in today’s world still messy enough? Isn’t it enough? Isn’t it all my life bad, and you don’t think about it. I can be bad. This is no problem. As long as you are worse than me, I am still the best one, this is reality.

If "reality is to refer to the actual standards" is a bit off the starting point and real focus of science fiction. The so-called "not in line with reality" is not the core issue at all. The main issue and the secondary issue must be clarified.

Science fiction is not a science fiction about future trends. The author Jun dares not say how scientific the content he wrote is, whether it can conform to science (I also made a common sense mistake before, because the ground-turning bias force is, there is no typhoon in the equatorial line, some readers pointed out that it has been modified now), but it is obviously a personal judgment of future trends and then expressed in the plot of the story.

For example, open source of recyclable rocket technology may be the case that Spacex will really open source significantly in the future, or it may not.

For example, the clichéd "space ladder" is hard to say in the future, because you can neither prove or falsify the future, and there are too many mutagenic factors, so there are various fantasies, which are one of the judgments on the future direction. Only future people know what the final answer is, but this does not prevent us from providing multiple choice questions to the future now.

If the "reality" in our eyes cannot tolerate anything else, we will put the secondary issues at the main level and deviate from the key points. We say arrogantly that perhaps because of this, our creativity is relatively lacking, so it is difficult to have a scientific madman like Elon Musk.

Sometimes, you have to dare to think about it, and whether it can be realized is another question.
Chapter completed!