Let’s first talk about the relationship and misunderstanding between quantum mechanics and consciousness, and then let’s talk about the paradox of the Three Gods.&1t;/p>

【About Quantum Mechanics】&1t;/p>

If relativity breaks people's traditional concepts of time and space, especially general relativity breaks people's impression of Newton's universal gravitation (the word used in physics is not to break, but generally uses the word correction), then quantum mechanics breaks the microscopic world that people imagine with their own macroscopic world, and presents people with a completely different microscopic world.&1t;/p>

If we have to describe this feature of the quantum world, it is: this microscopic world is simply very strange and we cannot speculate with common sense, but it is like that. We can only choose to accept it first and then find its rules.&1t;/p>

This is probably also the charming part of quantum mechanics. It has a sense of "divineness" that many people will say: The focus of science is theology.&1t;/p>

The magic of quantum mechanics is mainly reflected in its complete difference from the microscopic world we know:&1t;/p>

Let me first talk about the simplest difference - [Principle of Uncertainty]: This is a very important concept in quantum mechanics (by the way, when I first saw this concept in junior high school, I thought this book was talking nonsense, but the title and the author's reputation had to convince me that this is an existing scientific progress, because this book is called "A Brief History of Time"). This concept expounds a physical fact: it is impossible for us to accurately measure the degree of the particle at the same time while accurately measuring the position of a particle. Therefore, this concept seems to be also called the principle of inaccuracy.&1t;/p>

Based on the fact that our macro world may be difficult to understand, we will think that this is a problem of the existing scientific and technological development capabilities, but in fact, if we study it deeply, we will realize that this is an objective fact: when we measure any microscopic particle, we must choose a measurement method, and any measurement method is a certain energy method (such as light, ultraviolet rays, or other electromagnetic waves) to contact this microscopic particle, and after "bounce" back to our receiving instrument, we will know the position of the microscopic particle through certain calculations.&1t;/p>

In this process, the most interesting thing happened: because we need energy to collide with this particle to know the position of this particle, but if this particle is too small, the energy of the particle itself will also change after the energy we detect is "colliding". In this way, when we know the position of the particle we are going to measure, the particle is actually no longer in this position.&1t;/p>

To give an inappropriate example: it is like in the dark night, when we want to know where a table tennis is, we can't see it (no other way of measuring), we have to use another table tennis ball to collide with it. After the table tennis ball bounces back, we can calculate where the table tennis we want to know is based on the degree of the rebounded table tennis ball, but when we know, the table tennis ball is no longer there (the degree has also changed).&1t;/p>

This is the so-called uncertainty principle - this is not only a thought experiment, but also an objective fact.&1t;/p>

So this can explain to a certain extent why consciousness cannot be accurately calculated.&1t;/p>

Without considering psychology, biology, and brain neurology, from the perspective of physics alone, the basis of the human brain is the microscopic movement of synapses, and the consciousness of the human brain is the overall display of these microscopic movements at the macroscopic level.&1t;/p>

The microscopic movement of synapses is very likely to conform to the principle of quantum uncertainty, that is, the more we want to know the movement state of all synapses in the human brain at a certain moment, the less we are able to know how the synapses of the human brain move next moment. From a macroscopic perspective, this sentence can be translated into -&1t;/p>

The more we want to know what a person thinks, the more likely what a person thinks will change.—Of course, this translation is inaccurate.&1t;/p>

But we have actually seen many similar situations in similar psychological activities.&1t;/p>

For example, you say to a person: Are you thinking about something now? The other party answers: No.&1t;/p>

Then if you ask: really no? He thought about it and answered with a positive answer: really no!&1t;/p>

But what afterwards? His consciousness has been affected by you. He may think: I really didn't think about anything? Or he may think: I wonder if I was thinking about anything, is this what I was thinking about? Or he may think: What is the purpose of asking this question? Or he may think: I didn't think about anything, so should I think about something?&1t;/p>

In other words, when we measure a person's consciousness in a way, the person's consciousness is likely to change in the next moment - this is also the principle of uncertainty in a sense.&1t;/p>

Therefore, the uncertainty principle of quantum mechanics seems to be a physical rule, but if you think deeply, it is actually a philosophical proposition.&1t;/p>

Of course, as a novel, especially online novels, I cannot spend too much money on this aspect. I just amplify this microscopic quantum law to two macro levels, hoping to look at this problem from different perspectives: the first macro is the earth macroscopic consciousness of the world heaven master, and it is impossible to know exactly a certain "micro" computing device, or human. The second macroscopic consciousness is the cosmic level macroscopic consciousness, and it is impossible to know exactly the existence of a certain world heaven master (planetary macroscopic consciousness).&1t;/p>

Of course, if we follow the existing theory of quantum mechanics completely, these two macroscopic areas will not be able to intersect with the human world (because we cannot recognize each other's existence), but this is a novel after all, so Mu Yu designed a "backdoor", or "loophole".&1t;/p>

As we know earlier, the main reason for the inaccurate principle is that when measuring microscopic particles, a certain form of energy is needed to affect the particle. So Mu Yu thought, if it was not a certain form of energy to collide with the particle, but the particle itself would produce some energy?&1t;/p>

If we use the table tennis ball in the dark night as an example, it is that although there is no light in the dark night (no measurement method), the table tennis ball itself can light (can produce energy), and the light is large enough to be seen by us. In this way, we can know the specific information of the table tennis ball without having to bounce it through some energy measurement method and measure it again.&1t;/p>

Ideally, the error is minimal in this case, but how can we find particles that will light?&1t;/p>

Therefore, in the whole novel, we chose to use incense as an energy method to explode in extreme cases (that is, you can light yourself) to be realized by the macro consciousness of the universe. (Although it is not absolutely rigorous, it can also be used)&1t;/p>

In the whole novel, there are obvious explosions - appearing by the macro consciousness, in total three times: the first time, in the world of the Investiture of God, Sun Wukong used the Great Nirvana technique to attract the macro consciousness to appear this problem, and then relieve the disaster. (As the first season is about to end, friends who are interested can take a look); the second time, Hao Ning accidentally copied two gold coins of falling treasures, but absorbed the incense from several magic weapons into Hao Ning's body, but Hao Ning himself was unable to practice, so he could only store these magic powers (incense) and could not release (cast spells), and accumulated to a certain extent to explode, and then was revealed by his younger brother (macro consciousness). The third time, facing a magic weapon like Pangu Banner, Sun Wukong turned into countless gold coins of falling treasures, poured the magic power of Pangu Banner into Hao Ning, and was finally revealed by Hao Ning's younger brother (macro consciousness), which led to the dialogue of the origin.&1t;/p>

Among these three times, the first one was theological, the second one was inexplicable, and the third one was conscious.&1t;/p>

And the second inexplicable thing, there is a detail in the middle that you can note: in the darkness, after his brother told him to go back, Hao Ning first appeared some big wave-like things, and then seemed to be wrapped in a ball. This description can be considered a dream, but it can also be considered that this is a form of "wave-particle duality" under the macroscopic consciousness using Hao Ning's "microscopic" form. The wave-particle duality is one of the basic characteristics of electromagnetic waves or light that we humans appear.&1t;/p>

(This meme seems to be hidden a little too deep? Well, you can understand it as the romance of science and engineering men)&1t;/p>

In short, based on the principle of inaccuracy in quantum mechanics, Mu Yu sets the basic principles of the macroscopic (universe), macroscopic (earth), and human world, each unable to realize each other's other's basic principles, and at the same time gives the basic possibility of realizing each other: the existing special nature of Haoning's brother's soul and space-time, and the "self-light" phenomenon of Haoning's several incense explosions, which constructs the manifest characteristics of three civilization scales (especially human and cosmic level consciousness).&1t;/p>

By the way, the communication between the macroscopic consciousness of the earth and humans is similar, but it is not the connection between Hao Ning and Haoran (after all, the macroscopic consciousness of the universe is too far from humans, and the conditions required are also more stringent), but Yu Fei's obsession with Chen Busheng for life and death. This part is not discussed in the world view setting for the time being. If there is a chance in the subsequent postscript, I will explain it again.&1t;/p>

After explaining the principle of uncertainty, we enter into a feature of quantum mechanics that is closer to "theology", which is the so-called role of consciousness: the superposition collapse effect of observers on the microscopic world - thudding thudding thudding, are you some little excitement?&1t;/p>

[Observer Effect]: Simply put, the observer effect is also called the observer effect. It does not describe a theory, but a physical fact (this is the most terrifying).&1t;/p>

This physical fact is: for microscopic particles in quantum states, if no observer observes it, their state is a superposition of states of multiple possibilities. If an observer observes it, their state immediately becomes a certain state.&1t;/p>

The most classic case seems to be: When people do double-slit interference experiments on electrons, the experimental results seem to prove that electrons have the possibility of superposition of multiple states. So when people systematically observe the specific state of electrons, the double-slit interference disappears!&1t;/p>

Well, the above two paragraphs may cause many friends who do not care about quantum mechanics to die. In short, the facts of the above two things seem to point to a concept we were once familiar with: when I look at flowers, the flowers only exist; when I don’t look at flowers, the flowers disappear!&1t;/p>

Damn, isn’t this the idealistic idea we learned when we were young? Isn’t it wrong? Why is it manifested by quantum physics? This is the case in the microscopic world?&1t;/p>

So many people say that the quantum mechanics of physics just proves the distance effect of consciousness on microscopic particles, that is, God is possible.&1t;/p>

But! But! But! There is a conceptual error here! The observer here is not a human, and the observation process is not a human glance at the double-slit interference experiment of electrons, and then this experiment changes - anyone who explains the observer effect in this way is basically a hooligan: How can you be so able? You just look at the experimental results and then the experimental results change? Who are you? Who is the result of the experiment changes? Who is the pregnancy? Do you think you are giving a child Guanyin?&1t;/p>

The observers here are actually able to observe some microscopic measurement method of electron beams. The specific measurement method is relatively complicated. We will not elaborate on it. We only need to know one thing: the double slit of electrons is invisible to the naked eye. Similarly, the "observation" quantum effect of the observer must not be a simple action of our human eyes "seeing", but an observation behavior of the microscopic world.&1t;/p>

Since the observer is not a human, but a microscopic observation, it seems that the observer effect has nothing to do with consciousness?&1t;/p>

Hahaha, the pattern of Tusson is broken!&1t;/p>

Have you forgotten? The world of our Gods and Strange Stories from a Chinese Studio has three layers of macro-micro-violet worldview!&1t;/p>

In other words, macroscopic and microscopic are essentially a relative concept.&1t;/p>

In this way, from the macro perspective of the earth's scale and even the universe's scale, human beings themselves are a relative microscopic world. So is it possible that humans' own "microscopic world" also has an observer effect in a sense, that is, a reality that can be changed by "observation"?&1t;/p>

According to the experiment of quantum observers, under normal circumstances, it is impossible for microscopic particles to "observe" other microscopic particles without any trouble. Unless people eat carrots and worry about the sudden idea that I use the microscopic method to observe, this will lead to an observer effect, that is, the observer's change to reality.&1t;/p>

In this process, two elements are needed. The first element is the microscopic observation means, and the second element is the macroscopic observation intention (the second one is generally ignored by people). Generally speaking, only when these two are combined together can the observer effect be possible.&1t;/p>

If the human world is compared to the microscopic world, then if the microscopic observation means (human world) and macroscopic observation intentions (earth scale) are combined, in our common sentence, it is explained in this way - the unity of man and nature.&1t;/p>

The so-called unity of man and nature may be a state, a cultivation goal, or an existence.&1t;/p>

We call this existence: God.&1t;/p>

In other words, under the macro-microscale scale of the earth-human, the macro-level belief generated by the souls (combination of quantum states) of people in microscopic states is finally converged onto a specific idol. This objectively completes an objective "harmony between man and nature" process from the microscopic observation means (human world) to the macro-observation intention (partial earth scale). However, the grander the process, the longer the time, the more faith it is, the more effective this process is, and the greater the possibility of finally gathering into God.&1t;/p>

The above process is the essential process of the "Incense God" in the Strange Stories from the Gods - of course, if Mu Yu describes this process like this, I am afraid that readers will run half of it. It is extremely not romantic and not easy to understand, so I have to put it in the postscript!&1t;/p>

In this way, the gods produced in this process have some kind of observer effect on the "micro-world" of human beings, that is, they can change the "micro-world" of human beings based on their own observations. Just like the principle that micro-observers in quantum mechanics make the quantum state collapse and change through observations, we call this change to the "micro-world" of human beings "[mana]".&1t;/p>

Therefore, in this sense, the so-called magic power is actually the "micro" observation method from the human world scale to the macro observation intention, and the "distortion" of the human world caused by observation of the human world - this concept is difficult to understand, so Guan Zizhai only talked to Xiaohong once, and then he will not talk about it. Xiaohong, the "small learner", only talked to Haoning once, and then other higher-level people proposed this concept to Haoning.&1t;/p>

【Mana-About the distorted phenomenon of quantum states on reality】&1t;/p>

Here I want to say that the concept of "distortion" of the reality of the human world is not original to Mu Yu. It has two sources:&1t;/p>

The first source is the explanation of gravity by general relativity: Don’t worry, we don’t talk about general relativity, we just talk about one of the small points. Einstein’s general relativity theory has another explanation for the universal gravity proposed by Newton. It interprets gravity as that objects of different mass will have a "bending" effect on space and time. This bending effect, in the observation scale of our humans, is gravity.&1t;/p>

So in this book, Mu Yu borrowed this statement and "transferred flowers and wood" into the description of the relationship (mana) between the observer effect of quantum mechanics and reality. However, thanks to the profoundness of Chinese characters, I did not use bends, but used "distortion".&1t;/p>

The second source is a tribute to Jobs: Yes, it is the one on Apple phone. Jobs' biggest personal charm, called: the reality distortion force field. Of course, if you search on Baidu, you will know that this is just an exaggerated description of Jobs' huge personal charm. But in the novel Mu Yu romanticized it, combining this distortion force on reality with the effect of macro quantum states on reality.&1t;/p>

In short, through the debate between the triple macro-microscale and the extended guess of existing quantum effects of humans, the source and possibility of real events such as gods and mana are explained.&1t;/p>

In this sense, Mu Yu completed the requirements for this book in the introduction of "Strange Stories from the Gods": write about Gods without Gods, and use Gods without Gods.&1t;/p>

The question is, if everyone accepts such a setting, will our world have gods or no gods?&1t;/p>

In this way, the following question is very critical: The Three God Paradox.&1t;/p>

【Three God Paradox】&1t;/p>

The Three Gods Paradox was deduced by the Three Gods theory created by the Tianshi Master Li Yufei in this book - this is also very interesting. Originally, a top student in physics major realized theoretical laws related to God.&1t;/p>

Like all theories, the Three Gods Theory first recognizes objective facts, then explains objective facts, and then speculates certain assumptions.&1t;/p>

The objective fact described by the Three Gods Theory is: This world (Strange Stories from the World of Gods) has three states of gods—&1t;/p>

1. Legendary God: God described in religion or mythology&1t;/p>

2. Imagination God: God that people imagine in their minds because of various legends (including religions) (this time should have quantum effects, koko)&1t;/p>

3. Incense God: the real God produced by the continuous condensation of the imaginary God by people's souls (that is, the God that can distort reality as mentioned above).&1t;/p>

The relationship between these three states gods is:     [Legend God]----through legend---->[Imagination God]----------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Since the three gods of the gods and the world of Strange Stories from a Chinese Studio do exist (it seems that the third god has not been found in our real world), this theory is essentially complete and has specific theoretical basis - please refer to everything from the worldview (I) to the above for details.&1t;/p>

But the biggest problem here is the three major problems of the Three Gods paradox:&1t;/p>

[One of the Paradoxes of the Three Gods]: Because of human selfish desires, the propaganda organization (religion) where the [Legend God] is located is generally not allowed to produce [Incense God] to separate its own power in the world.&1t;/p>

To give an extreme example: We know the famous historical event of a Western religion: the Atonement Event. The originator of this event is the church itself, that is, the propaganda organization of the [Legendary God] in the world. This problem is a big deal. This event has lasted for more than two hundred years in history. In those two hundred years, the [Imagined God] in this sect in people's minds requires people to spend money to go to heaven! And the [Incense God] that arises from people's beliefs over the past two hundred years must have such characteristics or talents.&1t;/p>

This is like people believe in the concept that Guanyin can give birth to children for hundreds of years. Naturally, with Guanyin, he must have the ability to give birth to children.&1t;/p>

But this makes a problem. What God needs is people's beliefs, not specific money, and what needs money is actually the propaganda organization of [Legend God] in the world, which creates the fundamental contradiction between the propaganda organization of [Legend God] and the [Incense God]. This is the meaning of the existence of the God Destruction Sect. (As for why the God Destruction Sect appears on the land of China, I will explain it later)&1t;/p>

The above example can be further deduced: After 1562, the sects that sold the Atonement Book began to stop selling the Atonement Book. Over time, the strange belief that people preached to this sect would cost money to go to heaven will soon disappear. So what should the [Incense God] that arises before? This is another contradiction, but this contradiction is not between people and [Incense God], but it is still a contradiction between the propaganda organization of the [Legend God] and the [Incense God].&1t;/p>

Some other sects, as long as someone wants, make some modifications to the doctrine, resulting in a conflict between the divine desire and human desire between the propaganda institutions of [Incense God] and the [Legend God] is almost a high probability event. Is it a good idea to solve this high probability event... You know.&1t;/p>

Of course, the above assumption is a contradiction that only when the existence of the God of Incense is recognized in the world of the gods. In our real world, you can choose to admit that there is the God of Incense or there is no God of Incense. However, if you choose to admit that there is no God of Incense, what is the meaning of people's belief in God? If you admit that there is the God of Incense, then how do you believe that the God of Incense is consistent with the God of the [Legend God] propaganda organization? There is no contradiction?&1t;/p>

If you continue to think about this proposition, the second question of the paradox of the Three Gods will appear. Yi Ping refers to the answer I have always thought of, that is, before the propaganda agency of the [Legend God] promotes this God, how the image of this God was recorded in these scriptures. We might as well call the possible existence of the God in the [Legend God] propaganda [Primary God].&1t;/p>

So the second big problem of the Three Gods paradox is:&1t;/p>

[Plain God Two]: Why is there no [primitive God]?&1t;/p>

This seems to be completely different from our understanding of conventional God. Our general understanding of God is that a god has taught human beings. In order to thank him for his existence, human beings set up religions for him, constantly worshiping him and providing him with incense (this is [Primitive God]). However, in the Strange Stories from the Gods, this original God does not seem to be mentioned. Why?&1t;/p>

Because Zhou Yuan once proposed a theory: The Ship of Thessius. That is, how to define the same "I".&1t;/p>

Let me briefly talk about the concept of Thesius' ship: If the wood on Theseus' ship is gradually replaced until all the wood is not the original wood, then is this ship still the original ship?&1t;/p>
To be continued...