Feng Jianxiong stood up leisurely and cleared his throat.

This is not his first speech today. He answered a few questions when the other party asked the second debater just now. But at that time his plan to lure the enemy into depth had not been fully planned and was not considered to be carried out on the home court he chose. So he could only seek nothing but not pursue it.

Now that noon is here, it's time for him to open the CARRY.

"Class of the Third Opposition Debate, I would like to ask you a question - you just mentioned the examples of Huang XX sacrificing herself to block the hole of the gun and Dong XX sacrificing herself to blow up the bunker. I want to prove that 'food and clothing are not a necessary condition for morality, because some people can even give up their lives directly to achieve certain noble goals, let alone just not to have enough food and clothing', right?"

Feng Jianxiong's tone of questioning was calm and steady. When he said this, he paused for a second.

Everyone knows that this question has not been asked, but the first half of the question has successfully caused deep thoughts from the judges and audiences.

Everyone thought the boy's tone was very stable, and he felt inexplicably confident that he made the other party feel that "you have been trapped."

The third debater of the Academy of Digital Sciences was a tall and thin boy with a slim head named Qin Mingren. When Feng Jianxiong asked this question, he felt a chill on his back as he was stared at by the sinister fox. He couldn't help but search in his mind: "I... Is there any problem with the example I gave? Is there any loophole that he targeted?"

In an instant, Qin Mingren felt a little regretful.

In fact, when he and his teammates were rehearsing before the game, they didn't want to mention those too extreme examples. Because everyone knows that although those suicide warriors are very righteous, they really have nothing to do with "not having enough food and clothing".

The main reason is that Feng Jianxiong had arranged for Fu Yiming to answer, using the rhetoric of "Yan Hui/Du Fu/XXX is not considered as absolutely not a good meal" to enclose the ideas of the Academy of Digital Sciences.

Apart from Boyi and Shuqi, the people of the Academy of Digital Sciences really cannot give other extreme examples of starving to death directly for morality. In addition, Fu Yiming's playing style repeatedly relies on the view of "food and clothing threshold" to adapt to changes, which is almost a rogue, which makes people in the Academy of Digital Sciences restless and have to temporarily use extreme examples of "sacrificing their lives for righteousness" to change their concepts and pursue them relentlessly.

Their logic is roughly as follows: In order to practice righteous deeds, these "benevolent and ambitious people" can even refuse their lives, but can they still be afraid of not having enough food and clothing?

But now seeing Feng Jianxiong so confident, is there a hole dug in it waiting?

Qin Mingren hesitated and took a safe and conservative response: "We do not mean to make a judgment on which is greater, 'must talk about morality without food and clothing' or 'sacrificing one'. But in principle, I think these two behaviors can be compared horizontally in terms of difficulty."

All of the previous ones is a long story, but in fact, it only takes twenty or thirty seconds to answer psychological activities.

Seeing that the opponent's aura was suppressed and did not dare to resist directly, Feng continued, "Okay, even if I don't have to worry about the right or wrong of the two concepts of "willing to sacrifice my life for justice" and "can you talk about morality without food and clothing." I only ask you, can you prove that in the examples of sacrificing your life for justice, is the motivation or motivation that drives those righteous men to make a decision to abandon their lives?

As soon as the host Su Qin finished asking, his eyes lit up.

In the first 20 minutes of today, he was almost bored and fell asleep.

In his eyes, this kind of freshman competition between colleges is simply an amateur farce.

However, Feng Jianxiong's problem gave him a sense of danger of awakening from the sense of smell of wild beasts.

This question has been published for seven or eight years, and no one has ever thought about asking questions from this perspective: "I won't talk to you about whether those people can do good things in desperate situations, but only ask you if they can talk about morality in desperate situations."

"It's a bit interesting. I hope this third debater of the pro-party can bring a new creative way to this ancient topic. If such a person plays Go, no matter how skill is, he will definitely have the potential to create a school. Other details are 'micro operations' that can be industrialized and mass-produced like sticks, which is worthless."

Su Qin couldn't help but raise his evaluation of Feng Jianxiong in his heart.

The second person in the venue was not the other judges, but Yu Meiqin, the audience member of the Law School.

"A clever plan! This is to start with the derivation paradox of the unity of subjective and objective criminal law! Why didn't I think of this trick!"

Unfortunately, the debaters of the Academy of Digital Sciences, who were asked by Feng Jianxiong, and even the other melon-eating audiences present, did not notice the trap set in this question.

Only Su Qin and Yu Meiqin saw Feng Jianxiong’s intentions in the audience. They were so lonely as snow.

So, the third opposition debater Qin Mingren bravely stepped on him.

"The righteous men sacrificed their lives for righteousness and acted righteously, of course, based on morality. Do you have any questions about this? I think this is self-evident and does not need to be proved. I believe everyone present will agree."

Hearing the other party's answer, Feng Jianxiong finally showed a faint smile.

Just like before he was reborn, he was successful in making a trap for the other party in court.

Finally got caught.

"Optical debater, please put away your self-explanatory first - OK, according to your logic, does a person have to do good things in terms of behavioral results, and his motivation must be good?

Isn't that the same as a murderer who accidentally killed another terrorist, and he is a good person? A pesticide factory operator originally wanted to sell fake medicine, but because the fake pesticide he sold was accidentally used for suicide and failed. Then the act of selling fake medicine is moral? Wouldn't that be too ridiculous!"

Feng Jianxiong's rebuttal made Qin Mingren feel a little panicked.

"You...you are deliberately giving extreme examples. How can those who are kind and ambition I just mentioned compare to these people with "bad hearts and good things"? You are insulting your ancestors!"

Feng Jianxiong smiled lightly:

"Don't be impatient, is it an insult to the predecessors' opinions, and there is no need for the other debater to judge. My question just now is just to prove that the so-called objectively doing good things does not mean subjective motivation. Even if the subjective motivation is good, this motivation may not be based on the constraints and driving of the code of conduct of morality—

If you cannot admit this, it will lead to the ridiculous situations I mentioned just now. So, please ask the other debater, do you admit the basic judgment that 'action does not equal motivation, motivation does not equal morality'?"

The third debater of the Academy of Digital Sciences was circling his eyes and couldn't help but go to see the other three teammates.

However, when the other three teammates saw him looking over, they all pretended to be lying around him, but they didn't see him.

Obviously, these people don’t know how to refute Feng Jianxiong’s sudden strange trick.

It actually starts from the logical relationship between behavior, motivation and code of conduct.

This debate has been around for eight years, and I have never seen anyone use this kind of playing style!

Su Qin and Yu Meiqin both stared at the Third Defender of the Academy of Digital Sciences with bright eyes, with expectations and contempt, while the eyes of other audiences were even more complicated.

Qin Mingren couldn't stand the mental pressure that was so interesting and attracted everyone, so he decided to take a step back and breathe a sigh of relief: "I...I...I...I admit it!"

“Wow…”

The whole audience was in an uproar!

The debate lasted for 20 minutes. No matter how the game was, there was no incident where one of the parties directly admitted the other party's arguments!

Although Feng Jianxiong's current argument is just a small point in this topic that cannot be seen how to cooperate with the main debate topic.

But it is already very rare to make the opponent admit defeat for a while, and the local victory is hard to easily.

This section is really exciting.

"Although I can't understand what the other person is saying, it seems to be very powerful - it's so handsome to make the other person admit defeat at one point!" The inner portrayal of countless melon-eating girls in law school is like this at this moment.

"What's this handsome guy's name? Are there any classmates from Class 4? Ahhhh why no one told me! Tell me if you have big breasts!"

Well, the catchphrase that boys often use when they are eager to ask questions, "speak up if you are big" when they get to the group of eager girls, it will naturally evolve into "speak up if you are big breasts", which is fine.

Weng Dechen, who was sitting in the audience, looked as if dead, and felt incredibly hallucinating.

In his eyes, the little white-faced, who is so thin-skinned that he will blush when talking to a girl, does he have this strength?

Although Yu Meiqin is optimistic about him, isn’t it because Yu Meiqin thinks he is handsome?

How can this young man have such good eloquence and keenness? How dare he have eloquence? How can he be eloquent?

Weng Dechen's mind was buzzing, just like Mr. Zhao in "The True Story of Ah Q", trembling and trying to scold: Do you dare to have a surname Zhao? Do you deserve the surname Zhao?

It seemed that I felt everyone's ridicule. Qin Mingren, who had just given up a little, couldn't get over the old face. He ignored the rules of the game. After stuttering for a few seconds, he gritted his teeth and tried to find a little face:

"I just admitted that the other party's view of the third debater is true, but I just admit that the general meaningless sophistry of 'behavior does not equal motivation, motive does not equal morality'. But the other party's debater failed to prove that in the examples we just mentioned, 'The motives of those kind and those who are kind and ambition are not because of morality'! Big... Don't be deceived by him! If there is a kind, you can prove it in turn. What are the motives of those who are kind and ambition when they sacrifice their lives for justice in desperate situations? If it is not based on morality, what else can it be based on?"

Qin Mingren obviously came up with these words in a hurry, so he was a little incoherent and inverted.

He is actually one of the best masters among the freshmen of the Academy of Mathematics. His other three teammates have not yet reacted.

Being supported by his words, some of the audiences of the Academy of Sciences who had already felt embarrassed also suddenly woke up:

Yes! Law School only proves that "not all righteous men in desperate situations make righteous acts based on morality", but this is still far from "it cannot prove that any righteous men in desperate situations make righteous acts based on morality"!

Why was my side so stunned by such a side that was still far from the main debate topic?

"But even so, the third debater in the law school is really amazing..." Some girls from the School of Digital Science have already started to think this way.

You can openly check the contestants in the debate competition. Feng Jianxiong's figure is so majestic that the girls will not look at it.

"So handsome, upright, talented, sharp, so good..."

Unfortunately, just as everyone was waiting for Feng Jianxiong to answer positively, Feng Jianxiong always just smiled lightly, as if he didn't exist at all.

"Hey! Answer quickly! Did you have a sneak attack and there was no next move?" Several male audience members of the Academy of Digital Sciences began to cheer. The girl around her was caught by Feng Jianxiong, which was enough to make them unhappy.

Feng Jianxiong still smiled unfathomable and looked contemptuous.
Chapter completed!