Even some teams did it!

For example, in the famous "Istanbul Night", Liverpool fell three goals behind A Milan and equalized the score six minutes after the second half.

This is not replicable.

At that time, there were many factors in Liverpool's equalization. One of the important factors was that the opponent was too careless. Milan probably felt that he would definitely win the game. He started celebrating the championship at halftime, and was eventually stunned by Liverpool's consecutive goals.

In the current game, even if Millwall is careless, will Manchester City have a chance to equalize?

The answer is no.

Erikson knew in his heart that he must have lost the game, but the difference between losing more and losing less. Another difference is that he cannot let the team lose at all for the impact on subsequent games. If the morale is lost by the opponent, the subsequent game will definitely become difficult.

Now I can only wait for the halftime break to do ideological work for the players.

There was not much time left in the first half, and Millwall probably couldn't score a goal, so there was no need to make adjustments, so it was the only way for the time being.

Eriksen's non-expression made Manchester City players helpless.

What the Swedes don’t know is that many players are beginning to be dissatisfied with him, and many players know the conflict between him and Zhang Yang. Mirwall is so proactive, which probably has something to do with the conflict between the two sides?

The opponent's head coach formulated tactics to make the opponent play very smoothly, while his head coach, while he was so passive, sat on the bench and didn't move.

How to play the game?
Chapter completed!