Mu Yang's answer really made many Japanese reporters present very dissatisfied. This is in Japan, and your answer is so tough.

Many Japanese international critics frowned. The new ambassador to Japan seemed difficult to deal with. Does his remarks represent China's attitude? This is worth thinking about.

A Japanese reporter asked: "Amistant Mu Yang, will Sino-Japanese relations become better? What are the difficulties in improving relations? Many people in Japan believe that China has been using historical issues as a weapon to belittle Japan's contribution to world peace over the years and slander Japan's international credibility. If China, as a big country, has a broad mind, should it adjust its policy to Japan?"

Mu Yang replied: "Actually, it depends on Japan's attitude."

"At present, China-Japan relations are in the process of improvement, but the momentum of improvement is still very fragile. Since the two sides reached a four-point consensus on handling and improving China-Japan relations in November 2014, the relationship between the two sides has entered the process of improvement. The leaders of the two countries met, and dialogue and consultations between government departments, political parties, and legislative bodies between the two countries, as well as exchanges between local provinces, cities and friendly groups have also gradually resumed. However, the process of improving this relationship has not been smooth. Especially last year, Japan had some negative words and deeds on historical issues."

"Historical issues have always plagued Sino-Japanese relations, so we can't help but ask, what is the reason? I think of the proposition of a Chinese diplomatic senior on this issue. He believes that, 'The more the perpetrator does not forget to harm others, the more likely the victims will be to calm the harm they have suffered.' This sentence is not only a way for people to interact with each other, but also a correct attitude towards historical issues. How is the Japanese rulers doing on this issue? Please ask yourself first. People have their own opinions. 7o Many years ago, Japan lost the war, and Japan should no longer lose its conscience after 7o. Should it continue to bear the burden of history, or break with the past, and finally Japan will choose itself."

"In recent years, every conflict between China and Japan has occurred due to historical issues, and China has not once initiated it. The actions taken by China are all necessary reactions to Japan's beautification and denial of the history of aggression. We hope that Japan will keep its promises, clarify the responsibility for the war of aggression, face up to and sincerely reflect on the history of aggression."

"As the victim of Japan's militarist war of aggression, China is concerned about the historical attitude of Japan's invasion of China and Asian countries, whether it keeps its promises and whether it truly inherits the statement made by the Japanese government to the international community so far. Because this is not only related to the development of Japan's relations with its Asian neighbors, but also to the future direction of Japan. How past perpetrators show their sincere intention to reflect on the victims is very important. If they deliberately blur, downplay or even deny the responsibility for aggression, it is equivalent to poking the victim's scars again and sprinkling salt on the wounds.

China is concerned about how Japan summarizes that history and shows sincerity to reflect on the victims. Former German President Weizzek and former Chancellor Angela Merkel once expressed their views on historical issues. I agree with their attitude, which has also won respect and forgiveness from Germany. These can be a good reference for Japan."

Mu Yang's answer was very long, but the answer was very fluent, without a single wrong word and wrong sentence, which was clearly organized and understood. More importantly, he directly compared Germany to Japan, and his meaning was very clear. Germany won respect and forgiveness, and Japan denies it in every way, which can only be despised.

A reporter stood up and said, "Amusement to Muyang, regarding the issue of the four northern islands, Russia opens the four northern islands, and the construction of geothermal power plants and communication facilities on it also includes Chinese companies. Is this behavior of China suspected of participating in the territorial dispute between Japan and Russia?"

Mu Yang smiled and said, "If you have the chance to ask President Pukin directly, maybe he will give you a more direct answer."

The reporters then asked many questions.

"Will the Sino-Japanese Brain meet at the Washington Nuclear Security Summit in the near future?"

"Can China-Japan defense cooperation be completed?"

"How do you view the situation on the Korean Peninsula?"

"How to view the North Korean nuclear issue, and the US sanctions on North Korea."

“How will you do your work in Japan and what results are expected to achieve.”

Mu Yang answered these questions one by one. When it comes to his own, Mu Yang would express his views in detail. As for what he should not be managed by himself, Mu Yang just used one or two vague words to vaguely pass it.

The entire press conference lasted about two hours, and the press conference gradually came to an end. After answering a question, Mu Yang stretched out three fingers and said to the microphone: "The time is not short, the last three questions."

At this time, a European reporter was called up and stood up and asked: "Ambassador Muyang, I am AFP, I want to ask a question. Three days ago, when you submitted your national certificate at the Prime Minister's Office, An Sanxiang accidentally knelt in front of you. There are many reports on this matter, the media and the Internet, which made headlines for a while. What do you think about this matter?"

Mu Yang smiled: "Actually, it was just a small accident. Yes, it was indeed an accident. In fact, there were many such things. For example, when former Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon made a visit to Baghdad in Iraq, a 50-meter explosion occurred. Ban Ki-moon was so scared that he crawled under the table. Oh, it is worth mentioning that at that time, Iraqi Prime Minister Maliki and Ban Ki-moon stood together, and he remained motionless and acted very fearless."

"For example, President Putin once again made a speech, and finally forgot the words, didn't say a word, and then left the scene."

"For example, Bush was thrown away his shoes."

"For example, President Ann San was reported to sleep while attending the state funeral of former Singapore Prime Minister Lee Kuan Yew, and also the classic signboard of bent over when he met the US lawmaker."

"Actually, what I want to say is that it was just a small accident."

After hearing Mu Yang's words, some foreign media reporters couldn't help but chuckled.

Is this an explanation? This is a sarcasm.

After Mu Yang finished speaking, he stretched out his two fingers and said, "The second question is, well, this journalist friend."

Mu Yang pointed it up and asked: "I am South Korea mb to ask Ambassador Mu Yang what he thinks about Japanese politicians visiting the Yasukuni Shrine."

Mu Yang nodded and asked him to sit down, his expression gradually became serious, and he said loudly: "What I want to say first is that in 1985, after Japan then met Yasuhiro Suone to visit the Yasukuni Shrine, the two countries negotiated on this issue, and China and Japan reached a "gentleman agreement."

"The content of the agreement is that as representatives of the Japanese government, the three foreign ministers and the chief officials of the defense are not allowed to visit the Yasukuni Shrine."
Chapter completed!