Temple of rocks.

This is the essence of humanity...

Ordinary religious believers often receive the respect of the vast majority of people. Just like many Buddhists or Christians in reality, most of them are of a relatively gentle and kind personality. They will not cause trouble even if they are kind to others. Such people can naturally easily get respected by others...

But the fanatical religious believers are completely different...

Fanatic religious believers have completely different ideas and ideas from ordinary people. They regard religion as everything they have, even far higher than their lives. In a sense, such people have long lost themselves completely and become so-called puppets of religious belief...

The most typical manifestation of most cults is that they have a large number of fanatical believers. Under the brainwashing of cults, these believers completely lose their self-consciousness, become puppets of cults, and devote everything they have...

Most ordinary religious believers are kind, kind and generous, but fanatical religious believers are often cold, ruthless and cruel. Such people are naturally the type that gods hate ghosts...

He always feels that he is right, that he is kind, that he represents justice. In fact, their behavior has long exceeded the standards of humanity and has become a cancer in the humanitarian order...

In fact, the brainwashed believers in many cults are often very high in their original moral level, and most of them belong to the category of simple and kindness. However, after brainwashing, their moral standards will become deformed, and even far exceed the scope that society can accommodate, so they will naturally become a state that ordinary people cannot understand and accept...

Such people only seem to be just and take it for granted, but to outsiders, they are too crazy and even neurotic...

Many times, some fanatical believers in cults are not actually bad people, but their existence is just destroying the humanitarian order!

Many people actually want to do good things, but they lack the ability to do good things. They always do good things in a mess. The starting point is always good, but the final result is often contrary to the starting point...

Many people always think that the starting point is good, so that the behavior can be forgiven. However, in a sense, having a good starting point but not being able to achieve their own destination is a manifestation of a lack of clear cognition and sufficient ability...

It's like parents' education issues for their children...

Many parents always choose some wrong methods and methods when educating their children. Although the starting point is always good, the final result will always go against their wishes. However, many parents themselves often cannot face their own problems and always try to find problems from their children, and never reflect on whether their behavior is incorrect...

This educational model that actually makes non-love behaviors in the name of love is essentially a mistake. Sometimes, the more education parents receive, the more they often make such mistakes...

They always try to educate their children in their own way, but never consider the issue of teaching according to their aptitude...

In a sense, in the wrong way to educate children, in a sense, it may be better to choose not to educate children and let themselves grow naturally. Many college students who grew up in rural areas have no education, and do not have too many educational methods for their children. However, as long as children work hard, they can still become successful. On the contrary, if they choose the wrong way of education, they will have side effects on their growth...

Children's rebellious psychology will always have effects all the time, allowing them to naturally have big or small resistance to their parents' orders...

The nature of humanity has never made people go in the opposite direction...

In a sense, the essence of humanity is to truly achieve a state of unity of action and knowledge...

If you want to do anything, you can find the right way to do it instead of lacking enough ability and finally do a good thing in a mess...

The story of Zigong's slave redemption is just a small thing after all, but the insinuation of this small thing lacks a great wisdom in life...

The behavior of King Lu is naturally a kind of good deed, and this kind of good deed is not only the effect of good deeds itself, but also the kind deeds encourage more people to do good deeds, making doing good deeds a potential habit for everyone, and allowing everyone to correctly recognize the actual satisfaction that can be generated by doing good deeds, thereby inspiring people to do more good deeds...

In this incident, King Lu embodies a kind of humanitarian thought and humanitarian wisdom in the true sense...

In other words, King Lu’s own purpose is to do good deeds, and the methods he used can indeed truly do good deeds. This is a kind of wisdom that ordinary people do not have...

Many people only know how to do good things, but they completely know nothing about how to do good things and how to truly get help from those in need...

In society, there are many kind people, many people who are willing to help others, and many people who are willing to contribute or even sacrifice for others...

However, there are very few people who truly understand what kind of dedication, sacrifice, and help are what others really need, and how they should do it themselves!

This is the difference between a philanthropist and a good person in reality!

In the same way, doing good deeds, philanthropists can use the most reasonable way to help those who really need help, but good people often lack the ability to do charity...

It is not only a lack of wealth, but also a lack of operational and management capabilities...

The same amount of money falls into the hands of kind-hearted and helpful people. At most, they donate the money to those in need...

If it falls into the hands of philanthropists, philanthropists can allocate the funds in a reasonable way to the greatest extent, and ultimately allow more people to get the help they need the most. This help is not only a financial help, but also a substantial possibility of a better life...

For example, establishing Hope Primary School, establishing convenience hospitals, establishing vocational schools, etc., the same wealth can be generated through reasonable planning, and at the same time, giving more people in need, the most appropriate help...

At the same time, in this process, philanthropists themselves can also gain a lot of fame and fortune...

And this is a true sense of benefiting others and self-interest...

Philanthropists can earn wealth, reputation, and at the same time they can truly help those in need. This is the true meaning of charity...

And this is also a value that humanitarian order should be praised...

Charity in the true sense is not only to help others, but also to gain fame and fortune. Only when it comes to gain benefits can people devote themselves to it...

In real life, some phenomena seem to be praised by people on the surface, but when you think about it carefully, they are actually anti-humane ideas...

For example, to give a simple example...

After working hard for more than a dozen or even dozens of hours, after five or six surgeries, the doctor was exhausted and collapsed under the operating table, and then someone took photos, praising him as the so-called most beautiful doctor...

However, in a sense, this kind of praise and praise should not exist in itself...

On the contrary, people should question why a doctor is so laborious, why a doctor needs to work for so long, why a doctor can still perform surgery on patients when he is highly fatigued, is this arrangement of the hospital reasonable and meets the humanized standards, and is there obvious omissions in the hospital's rules and regulations, just like a driver cannot drive fatigue, is a fatigued doctor doing surgery for a patient? Working with high fatigue, should a surgeon who needs high precision as a professional standard be praised or criticized?

People cannot subconsciously recognize the doctor's character and medical ethics just because they see a doctor insisting on working in fatigue. Most of the time, they should look at the essence of this matter through phenomena. A doctor who is tired and persisting in working should not appear in the news, because this matter itself reflects the inhumanization of the hospital's doctor's management, which reflects the lack of hospital management capabilities, and reflects the lack of adequate attention of the hospital and doctors for the patient's surgery. Otherwise, why would the doctor who is tired working be on the operating table?

It's like an official story, saying that there are two villages and floods often occur, so the superiors dispatched two village chiefs to manage. One of them chose to control water, build dams as soon as he took office, and strengthened residents' awareness of prevention, and often conducted relevant lectures and exercises. The other village chief, after taking office, did nothing...

So, one day, the flood really came...

The village that built the dam was finally intact and there were no property losses or casualties. The village was baptized by the flood and lost a lot of property. However, when the flood came, the village chief was desperate to rescue the disaster and finally received commendation from relevant leaders and was promoted. On the contrary, the village chief who had worked hard to control the water was always unknown...

What does this story mean?

This shows that many times, what people praise is exactly the least part that should be praised!

This is the reason why a good fighter has no great achievements...

A truly good hospital does not need so-called touching deeds to set off, nor will it happen so-called touching stories, because when the hospital system is reasonable enough, the so-called touching deeds themselves will never happen...
Chapter completed!