Xiaoshantou was not scolded.

To be precise, Guan Yin was not scolded.

Six fairies were tying together to watch the live broadcast, and were all ready to be scolded.

As a result, Teacher Dai neither criticized nor ridiculed him directly.

People are talking very seriously.

"Actually, before I returned to the imperial capital, I watched a "Serf" show. Before that, I also watched some good works by a small team, including the one that is gradually becoming some people. Now, some people are so professional. From the comparison of colors, I can write a doctoral thesis that I have given me a lot of people. Oh, I have watched this TV series that is more criticized by the Soul Ferry. I originally thought about writing something, but later I thought that since it is more popular and has more positive reviews, I won't add icing on the cake." Teacher Dai said bluntly.

As soon as this comes out, some people get unhappy.

"Did you buy it for money?"

“Isn’t there any criticism?”

"Do I just feel like I can't watch any movie?"

It’s just a matter of gathering together, you have to scold them.

Teacher Dai turned a blind eye, and there was actually a barrage on the computer in front of him.

"It should be said that "Tian Zhu" has flaws, and the flaw is that I can't find the point of bringing the characters." Teacher Dai criticized, "To be honest, I still don't know how to use professional terms for students to analyze in class."

This is why Guan Yin didn't care much about it after he figured it out.

Although the academics have academics' persistence, some persistences are unnecessary in his opinion.

It is a common problem for academic artists or art critics and educators to say everything.

"So "Tian Zhu" is entirely based on the plot and atmosphere, especially the plot guides me all the way. I don't pay attention to Liu Weihua's acting skills and Zhang Hengping's acting skills. The characters I imagined are completely coincidental with their performances. So this is a good movie, a phenomenon-level movie in the positive sense, but what touched me was not the movie itself, but the case of the facts. In my opinion, the success of this film is a successful restoration of such a thing, while "Serfs" is different." Teacher Dai leaned forward, "I often questioned? It is human nature to seek profit and avoid harm, so it is human nature to sacrifice oneself for justice, right?"

She also laughed.

A little sad laughter.

"Compared with the previous few movies, even a profound movie like "Lost orphan", or a heart-wrenching movie like "The Unknown"? I think it is more that "Serfs" is a truly good movie, and there is no "Aesthetic Ritual" in the whole article? But it reflects "Aesthetic Ritual" everywhere? In layman's terms, it is a long-shot narrative, just like a landscape painting, with endless words and endless meanings. In this movie, I am shocked? The historical nature of human nature? The human nature of history? The human nature of history? The pursuit of profit and avoid harm to insensitive? Sacrifice for righteousness to live without fear of death? The camera is cold, and the warmth outside the camera is expressed with extremely infinite lenses, which is about small people, and about great human nature? From humble to noble? From small to greatness? This is the master of a hero and ugly score?

It is a movie that cannot be criticized." Teacher Dai sighed, "One of my students sent me a micro-message to tell me that they organized discussions on the artistic nature of "Serfs"? A few days ago, I asked, and I was particularly disappointed. It can be said that the times and crew wanted to tell them that these academic future elites had no grasp of them."

The reporter said that he didn't understand very well.

"The audience understood it, so they didn't." Teacher Dai bluntly blamed the host. She thought it was a kind of confusion about understanding. "You may not understand the historical nature of human nature and the human nature of history. Simply put, the historical nature of human nature is reflected in the attitude of the master and senior slaves to treat serfs. In the old society, whether the master or slave, they naturally believed that serfs were their cattle and sheep. This was the general knowledge of the old society. Isn't this the historical nature of human nature? History is human, so with the later things, awakening is a great thing. In the movie, I asked myself, are serfs born lowly? Do they have to be lowly for generations? This is equivalent to the moment when the ancestors of human beings raised their heads and looked up at the bright starry sky."

The host suddenly realized that he could still see this.

"There is no great reason to preach, and it is to present the cruel history before you. But how many viewers today are wearing eye masks, shut their brains, and go to the cinema to watch movies in a daze? There are, but few, so people with eyes and brains will naturally look at that cruel history from today's perspective. This is the cleverness of the movie, that is, human choices, and more reflect the choice of position. What the whole movie wants to show is actually the process of ordinary audiences watching the first half of the process, the power of anger contained in their hearts. The greatness of this movie is that people do things, the cruel and ruthless master, the slave who helps evil, and the Bodhisattva-like golden pearl mami. They are all human beings, some are doing evil, some are doing good, they are flesh and blood, history and position. On the other hand, isn't this a plain description of the appearance of modern sentient beings?"

This is beyond the scope.

Movies that cause trouble must have implications.

But isn’t the meaning that you want to express?

"This movie is a essay poem with grand narratives. If you can't understand or admit it, it's not embarrassing." Teacher Dai's habitual poisonous tongue scratched her, "If you don't have a soul with historical romanticism, you can't understand the cold cruelty of history, and naturally you can't see the spiritual praise of this narrative essay poem. You may be able to understand the touch of "The Pianist on the Sea" because you are used to commercial blockbusters. Oh, the so-called sense of aesthetic ritual is like, you often eat Kaifeng dishes and love to listen to pop songs. You want to give you a table of Luoyang flowing water to give you a table of Luoyang. You can enjoy a piece of water for you.

When "The Orphan of Zhao", you have to turn the table up. The problem is that this film has matured to find a way of displaying our nation between commercial blockbusters and epic narrative films. If you look at it from the perspective of commercial blockbusters, it is naturally uncomfortable, but you like to watch it. And when you look at it from the perspective of so-called art films directed by Qiu Yun, you are not convinced that there are so many audiences in a literary film, let alone you position your own viewing perspective in this film, otherwise you will definitely refute, which angle did you watch it from."

Translate Teacher Dai's words.

The movie is in the atmosphere, she is in the stratosphere, most of the professionals are in the troposphere, and most of the audience is in the surface.

And you?

"The host is on the 18th floor underground." Some smart and troublesome netizens posted barrage.

The host was embarrassed, and he had never seen it at all.

What he wants to do is to collect comments from some people online and discuss this phenomenon.

How can Teacher Dai say about his vision?

It's the same feeling as "I am so confused by the lard today that I am like you."

The host's dignity was greatly insulted.

look!

I don't believe that I was reminded and I still can't understand a movie!

But are there no shortcomings in "Serfs"?

have!

"This movie should not appear at the current stage. The box office is not bad for the movie, and the film industry is not bad for the movie. If anyone has any doubts, then please let these directors, screenwriters, and crew who have the idea of ​​the surface to deconstruct this big movie. The smoothness of narrative, the comfort of the lens, the advanced nature of straightforward but not direct narrative, the criticality of history and human nature, and the awesomeness outside of criticism are more worthy of action-oriented research than your so-called "artistic nature of control, the background nature of the main creator" and even the despicable argument that "you can do it" is better than the so-called "generation of directors" and the directors, otherwise, the so-called generation of directors, may not see the sun of tomorrow. They directly inherit the older generation and start the last three generations, and all you have left is the so-called sense of ritual." Teacher Dai was deeply worried.

It is not a good thing to be successful alone.
Chapter completed!