A reader in the book review area asked, is this book [textualization] rigorous?

I still have to say it seriously here.

How to say it

Unless otherwise specifically explained in my book, this is because of the historical changes caused by the author's time travel...

[For example, Li Jing should have destroyed Jie Li Khan in 630. My book says that because the aristocratic family monopolized the army of money and grain was delayed by more than a year.]

Otherwise, the others have been rigorously verified.

Because I spent half a year before writing this and read more than 300 papers about the Tang Dynasty.

These papers also cost a lot of money to download, not for free.

Why read the paper?

Because there are too many articles studying the history of the Tang Dynasty now, but you can write it casually.

But can this be written casually, such as doctoral thesis? It doesn’t exist!

So what if I still get an error after reading my doctoral thesis?

There is really nothing I can do about this! I really can't wear it back to real history to proofread it.

Well, in fact, I was sad to find that after reading more than 300 papers, only dozens of them can be used!

But no matter what, I think this is an attitude! It is a good habit.

History can be ridiculed, but history must be rigorous!

Otherwise, how good is it to write a history directly? Whatever you want!

But I can't write [Failed History]! I feel that history can be changed at will, isn't this nonsense?

Well, after saying so much, what I want to express is that I am still relatively rigorous! I have passed [textual research].

Let’s give an example!

Duke Li Jing of Dai, Duke Cheng Zhijie of Su Guo, and Li Yuanchang of Lu.

These are the names of the 5th year of Zhenguan. I think many readers only know about King Li Yuanchang of Han?

These titles and names cannot be written randomly.

My book was unfolded for 633 years.

Because Princess Changle and Wu Mei were older at that time.

But then there was no way, and it was mentioned again in 631.

Then he dragged the war between Li Jing and Jie Li Khan to 631 years.

If it was delayed until 633, it would feel a bit nonsense.

The reason why it was advanced to 631 is because there were some things this year.

The Warriors did return to Chang'an in 631, and the above statement requested Li Shimin to Fengshan. This time is also right, everyone can check it out.

In history, Ma Zhou was discovered by Li Shimin in early 631. This time was also right. Just go to the Internet to check it out.

Also, at that time in the Tang Dynasty, Sinong Temple had a pig raising institution.

Sinong Temple did give birth to 8-legged pigs.

However, this incident was not from 631, it was just a borrowing. You can go to the New Book of Tang to check it out.

Also, in the 5th year of Zhenguan, the highest leaders of Sinong Temple and Dali Temple were Cui Shanwei!

Besides, in the 5th year of Zhenguan, there was only one Shaoqing in Honglu Temple. Later, another one was added.

Also, it is the question of name.

Dali Qing - cannot be called Dali Temple Minister.

Hongluo Minister--cannot be called Hongluo Minister.

Whether it is the new or old Tang books, you can check it out.

Also, we will prepare to write about Ganye Temple and Wulu Temple.

Everyone knows Ganye Temple.

Do you know what Wulu Temple is?

Well, it is the famous Dacien Temple!

This was built by Empress Changsun, whom Li Zhi missed the passing of death. Empress Changsun was not dead in 631, so of course it was impossible for Dacien Temple to be found.

However, many authors will write incorrectly.

Even the Taohua Village where Li Chenghua is located is [real existence]!

In fact, it is - Taoxi Fort in the south of Chang'an City?

Don’t know Taoxi Fort?

OK, please learn about a poem!

...

Last year, today, people's faces and peach blossoms complement each other.

I don’t know where the faces of the human faces go, but the peach blossoms still smile in the spring breeze!

…………

This poem was written in Taoxi Castle.

So, I accept it if this book is not good!

But I say that my research is not rigorous? I don’t accept it!

To be honest, after I read more than 300 papers from the Zhenguan period in half a year, I read the history book of Qidian again? No matter what kind of god it is, I can pick out a lot of mistakes.

Alas, of course I don’t have the leisure to blame others! I don’t want to travel with me to kill my whole family.

Well, actually speaking so much is nonsense - the reason why I wrote more than 1,000 words to say this [textual research]?

It was because a reader posted a post in the book review area.

He said something and I replied 1500 words.

I asked - how can such a [fool-minded] author write randomly without research?

OK, I'm showing up!

The reason I have time to reply 1500 words is because there are few people who post book reviews!

What does this prove?

This proves that our book is so fucking [no one reads it]!

Otherwise, even if I want to reply, I can't reply so many reader reviews!

Therefore, I would like to read it here to express my gratitude! I will work hard to write it well!

Or you can save it and fatten it up before you talk about it!

Thank you!

…………

Happy beauty
Chapter completed!