In fact, Chen Hang's direct confrontation and public rebuttals and statements still have a great effect.

"The Sad" is a movie after all, and to be honest, this movie has a very good reputation!

Therefore, there are many supporters.

The great director Chen Hang angrily retorted those remarks at the first time, and it quickly worked!

Soon Wang Yifan also accepted an interview with the media.

There is no way. Although Chen Hang is the director of "The Sad", he is the provider of the story.

"People in civil science regard He Xi as a spiritual idol, while anti-counterfeiting people Zhang Zhou and others believe that "The Sad" promotes pseudoscience and has brought extremely bad effects to the public. In this regard, as the screenwriter of "The Sad", Director Wang, do you have anything to say to them?"

Wang Yifan smiled and said, "First of all, the first question is that for the civil sciences, perhaps He Xi's experience has indeed made some of them meet, but what I want to say is that He Xi is a fictional character, and treating a fictional character as a spiritual idol itself shows that their starting point is a big problem.

The reason why He Xi makes people sympathize is because he is a martyr, and the reason why everyone knows that he is a martyr is because more than a hundred years later, his theory was proven, and this is the premise!

But none of us can predict the future, so down-to-earth is the reality, and He Xi is just a character in the movie!”

"The second question is that I cannot understand what "The Sad" promotes pseudoscience and has bad effects.

First of all, everyone knows that "The Sad" is first and foremost a movie, and the story of the movie is fictional, and if a movie can make the masses believe in pseudoscience, it would be too worth watching a movie!

The biggest disadvantage of this argument is to retreat with the times!

In the past, when movie censorship was relatively strict, it seemed that these people said that the censorship restricted the imagination of the creators of the movie, and they would say that Hollywood was like that.

But now the Film Bureau has just relaxed the censorship system of movies, which is because it has downplayed the educational function of movies and strengthened its entertainment function.

You can say you don't like this movie, but please don't double standards.

Just like what I saw before, someone said that idealism is sometimes poisonous, and that He Xi could go abroad. This statement is simply ridiculous and funny.

Those sad people like He Xi mentioned in the movie seem to be foreigners, right?

Because some different views deny a movie, this violates the principle of social progress!

And I really wonder if you have watched the movie correctly, because if you have watched the movie, you should know that He Xi’s theory in the movie has been verified and confirmed to be correct!

His mentor also knew that his theory was correct, and this is the premise!

What he faces is that theories are useless, not something he thinks of with a slap in his head!

So people in the civil sciences regard He Xi as their idol. Please pay attention to this point and first prove that your theory is correct, and then talk about other things, instead of imagining it out of thin air, saying that gravity does not exist. That is nonsense and fantasy!”

After Chen Hang, Wang Yifan and others spoke out.

Those who support "The Sad" have also posted articles to support and refute those people.

"We oppose vulgarity and low-quality films, and call for the unity of the three sexes: both viewing, artistic and ideological, and only on this basis can our box office be meaningful! "The Sad" is undoubtedly a movie with the unity of the three sexes. We cannot kill one stick just because the movie is insufficient!"

"I hope everyone will give Chinese movies a little more tolerance. It has its shortcomings, but what it needs is help. The most annoying people who are good at domestic movies but end up picking their bones in various double standards and various eggs.

The movie is not that scary. After watching "Water Margin", many people will rebel and go up the mountain to become bandits?

Also, for those who say idealism is sometimes toxic, I just want to say that your idea is really toxic.

Your statement itself is very problematic, okay? It is risky to act bravely, but because it is risky, is it encouraged everyone to refuse to save them?

What I hate most is that I never read Chinese science fiction novels, science fiction movies, and various science fiction movies that praise Hollywood.

"Star Pilot" ends with the pilot hitting a comet in order to protect the earth. Isn't this idea itself idealistic? Why didn't you say it's poisonous?"

Soon, many domestic science fiction novelists also appeared to refute these remarks.

The famous science fiction novelist Ma Ling said: "Understanding theory is not a matter of science fiction, nor is it something that science fiction can do. All we can do is describe our own imagination and create a science fiction image."

Science Fiction magazine media also stated: "The creators of science fiction novels describe their own imagination and create a science fiction image. They are not scientists or scholars, and they do not have those rigorous scientific knowledge. Just like martial arts novelists, it is a truth that they are not martial arts masters themselves! Taking science fiction seriously is an incredible thing!"

Although these are still difficult to refute those opponents, it is no longer important at this time.

Because, don’t be afraid of controversy, the most feared thing is one-sidedness.

In fact, those who truly understand, don’t know what this means.

Do those so-called opponents, so-called anti-counterfeiting fighters, etc. really think that "The Sad" is promoting pseudoscience?

In fact, it is all nonsense. The reason why they are so popular and criticized "The Sad" is because "The Sad" is something they can get and can get the popularity.

As for those civil science subjects, why don’t they talk about it?

It is because those civilians have no value in criticizing that they catch up with "The Sad" to make a fuss!

And do those civil sciences really regard He Xi as a spiritual idol?

Maybe there is, but people who truly regard He Xi as a spiritual idol will not proclaim it, nor will they proclaim themselves as contemporary He Xi.

Everything is more about interests.

Let me ask, if "The Sad" is not so popular, will these people come out and say it?

Surely not, because if you are not popular, it means no one pays attention, and it means that their scolding is instead promoting the movie.

In fact, to put it bluntly, for Chen Hang, for Wang Yifan, for "The Sad", it is a problem for those civilians to pick out the monsters and monsters and monsters to come out.

Because these people are indeed a realistic portrayal of the so-called "bad impact" brought by the movie.

On the contrary, Zhang Zhou and others jumped out, and it seemed that they were scolding, but in fact, if these people jumped out, the nature of their own affairs changed.

This is indeed the result!

Those people in the civil sciences and contemporary He Xi did cause considerable trouble for the movies.

And those who support them will not speak because of these people, but once Zhang Zhou and others come out, it will be different.
Chapter completed!