No evaluation system can be absolutely objective, and there will be some subjective things.

Generally speaking, the fewer subjective things are, the easier this evaluation system will be and the smaller the differences between judges.

For example, in the alliance's evaluation system, there are very little differences between the judges.

Evaluation based on the same standard will be very similar.

Of course, the rating system created by the association cannot be compared with the rating system of the alliance. It will definitely not be as excellent as the alliance rating system. However, Gui Qiao and others will still try their best to correct and iterate, and modify it as much as possible.

Practical testing is a measurement of real swords and guns.

First of all, no errors can be made.

A weapon refiner has unique skills, but he cannot give people a review of it so he has no unique skills.

The weapon refiner's unique skills are unqualified and cannot be evaluated as qualified.

The weapon refiner's unique skills also have levels, and you cannot make mistakes in terms of levels.

This is a very basic requirement.

If these requirements cannot be achieved, then this rating system is waste, it is wasteful and cannot be used at all.

Therefore, the entire association is very serious and very careful in testing in this regard.

Through practical testing, some problems can be found.

The old predecessors who participated in the creation of the entire rating system gathered together and started discussing whenever there was a problem. If there was a need to modify it, they would directly modify it.

After practical verification, it has been proved that the newly created rating system is actually usable.

The most basic rating function meets the design requirements.

This is a system that can be used and there will be no errors.

The question of whether it can be used has been verified, and the next thing is whether it is easy to use.

Whether it can be used refers to whether the rating system has reliable rating capabilities; whether it is easy to use is the objectivity, precision, accuracy and other issues mentioned earlier.

After practical testing, it must be said that it is not easy to use? But it is not that difficult to use.

It means not easy to use? In fact, this rating system is not that excellent.

At least compared with the alliance's rating system? The system created by the association seems very ordinary and there is nothing to praise.

But in fact? It's not that difficult to use either.

Is objective and fineness okay? Is the accuracy okay?

There is nothing outstanding? But there are really no major flaws.

In fact, the newly created rating system is almost the same.

A good rating system, in real use, constantly iterating, constantly modifying, and adjusting, thus slowly evolving.

Now, it is actually very good that the original version can achieve this level.

However? Gui Qiao is still more careful.

He arranged the manpower again and conducted the second and third tests. After confirming that there was no problem, the system design began.

Rating system? It must cooperate with system design.

Because ratings are always people ratings.

Since people are rating? That's inevitable? Some people will cheat.

The former association was the first to fall in the rating service field.

Don’t forget the past, and the teacher of the future.

The reorganized association naturally needs to prevent corruption.

And this requires institutional design.

The alliance's evaluation system is simple and practical, but the problem is that the alliance's system cannot be used by the association.

Because the two rating systems are different.

The alliance's rating system is a comprehensive assessment. If you have enough level, you can serve as a judge.

So, they can use a jury and then draw lots to select the judges.

But the rating system of the association is different.

The association's evaluation system is aimed at unique skills.

Instead of every weapon refiner knows unique skills, not every weapon refiner can evaluate all unique skills.

For example, different types of unique skills are like Chinese, mathematics, foreign languages, physics, chemistry, biology, etc.

No judge is proficient in all kinds of unique skills.

Even Gui Qiao only knows a little.

He doesn't understand some unique skills in some fields.

Since you don't understand, it's impossible to draw lots.

Otherwise, I don’t understand what I draw in the lottery, Isn’t this funny?

Therefore, although the alliance method is good, the association is really useless. Establishing a jury and then drawing lots is completely inapplicable to the association.

For the association, multiple different rating teams need to be formed, and then a special rating team will be allowed to review the corresponding unique skills.

In this way, the judges are fixed.

The judges are fixed, which means that this is easy to cause corruption.

Because the judges are fixed, there is a possibility of bribery and accepting bribes.

If there is no special design, then no matter how you manage it or prevent it, there will inevitably be corruption, at most it will be just a difference between sooner or later.

Because, in the final analysis, people are selfish creatures.

Don't love money, then, what about women?

If you don’t love women and money, then what about your family?

If you don’t love women, don’t love money, and don’t care about your family, then, what about power?

Even if you don’t love power, then what about human debt?

As long as people are selfish, corruption is inevitable.

When everyone gets together, they want to design a system, so that people can’t even be corrupt even if they want to.

In the end, someone came up with a solution - imitating the college entrance examination marking.

When you mark the college entrance examination papers, you can’t see the name, you can only see the answer.

The review of the Artifact Refining Association will also adopt a similar method.

Those who participate in the rating will display it in a specially made room and then record it.

This room is specially made. Through the cooperation of the formation, the participants are hidden and any of his physical movements are hidden, leaving only the reaction process of refining the weapon.

And this process was taken and videotaped.

In the end, all the judges saw was the video.

There is no name in this video, and the judges do not know who the participant is.

In this case, bribery is useless.

Because the judges don't know who is who.

Of course, participants can also make some special actions to hint or remind.

And this is actually very good.

If there are irrelevant actions or non-refining technical actions, start over.

As long as you ensure that the video submitted to the judges is clean and without a video with a code of action, it is enough.

And it only takes on-site supervision to complete it.

On-site supervision can adopt a lottery system similar to the alliance, first forming a supervision team, then drawing lots to determine the supervisors on the day.

Finally, the supervisors supervise the participation process and then supervise the video content.

In this way, the video submitted to the judges is clean.

The judges only see the refining process.

They can only review the refining process.

In this way, the system can be implemented to maximize the problem of corruption and degeneration.
Chapter completed!